ÂÌñÏ×ÆÞ

Earlier in 2022, Zaheeruddin Mohammed, a graduate from the Department of Materials Science & Engineering at the Tuskegee University (Ala., U.S.), co-published new developments in more sustainable methodologies for effective biocomposite reinforcement. Specifically, the research details a method for making higher quality bio-derived carbon (called “biochar”) to be used to reinforce polymers in 3D printing applications. 

Carbon-based nanomaterials such as fullerene, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon nanofibers (CNFs), graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) and carbon black are reinforcement filler materials that have been widely used to improve or enhance the mechanical properties of composite materials. However, they are traditionally derived from fossil fuel gases/liquids like methane, ethylene and acetylene, and require expensive and sophisticated processes to be manufactured [1].

Featured Content

Automated Composites Knowledge Center READ MORE

Assembling the Multifunctional Fuselage Demonstrator: The final welds READ MORE

Bladder-assisted compression molding derivative produces complex, autoclave-quality automotive parts READ MORE

Biochar, the synthesis of carbon from sustainable biomass-based precursor materials, is said to be a bio-based alternative to these more traditional carbon nanomaterials. In addition to a more sustainable and controlled processing method, biochar carbon still effectively enables excellent mechanical and thermal properties when used as a reinforcement filler; when it comes to thermoplastics in particular, it is noted that “biochar has a competitive advantage over other natural fillers, as they are more thermally stable to the heat induced during manufacturing processes like melt blending and extrusion [2].” 

Nevertheless, current biochar is not as effective in improving mechanical and electrical properties of composites at low loading percentages as fossil fuel-based carbon nanomaterials; as a result high loading percentages of biochar carbons are required. To make biochar more competitive, researchers at the Tuskegee University synthesized high-quality biochar from sustainable starch-based packaging waste using a high-temperature/pressure pyrolysis reaction.

According to Mohammed et al, an ultrasonication method to reduce the particle sizes and increase active surface area was used, making biochar more compatible for dispersion, effective reinforcement and 3D printing. The modified biochar was used as an effective reinforcement filler with polypropylene polymer at a relatively low loading of 0–1 wt.%. In addition, tensile modulus and strength increased by 34% and 46% respectively with a loading of just 0.75 wt.%. Thermal stability of the composite material also improved by 51ºC in onset of decomposition temperature and 40ºC in maximum rate of decomposition temperature at 0.75 wt.%. Failure analysis of fractured surface revealed that ultrasonicated biochar was effective in reinforcing the material due to improved available surface area and nanosize defects formed on the surface of biochar carbon.

The next challenge was achieving a good interface between the filler and the matrix. Instead of traditional wet methods for surface modification, Mohammed and his team employed low-temperature plasma (LTP) treatments in the presence of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas. Ultimately, the technology was effective in the fluorination of biochar carbon like in wet chemical methods, improving tensile strength by 91% when compared to neat polymers and 31% compared to untreated biochar-reinforced polymers at 0.75 wt.% loadings. Elongation at break also increased from 12.7 to 38.78, showing a 216% increase. In this work, it was shown that plasma-based treatments were an effective and sustainable path to develop composite parts using additive manufacturing methods with improved mechanical and thermal properties [3].

References

[1] Mohammed, Zaheeruddin, Shaik Jeelani, and Vijaya Rangari. “.” Materials Letters 292 (2021): 129678.

[2] Mohammed, Zaheeruddin, Shaik Jeelani, and Vijaya Rangari. “.” Composites Part C: Open Access 7 (2022): 100221.

[3] Mohammed, Zaheeruddin, Shaik Jeelani, and Vijaya K. Rangari. “.” ACS Omega (2022).